Iga Swiatek vs. Maddison Inglis Prediction, Odds, Best Bets & How to Watch
Second seed Iga Swiatek meets qualifier Maddison Inglis in the fourth round of the 2026 Australian Open in Melbourne. The market is pricing this like a formality, with Swiatek as a massive favorite. Swiatek’s run has been mostly straightforward. She opened with straight-set wins over qualifier Yue Yuan and Marie Bouzkova. Then she was extended but still advanced with a three-set win over 31st seed Anna Kalinskaya. That third-round match is the only real data point showing any vulnerability so far.
Inglis has needed time on court just to get here. She won three-set matches over Kimberly Birrell and Laura Siegemund. Then she advanced when Naomi Osaka withdrew due to a reoccurring left abdominal injury. Inglis is fighting well, but she’s stepping into a huge level jump against a player whose 2025 stats were elite, including 45.4% return points won and a 58% breakpoint conversion rate across a heavy 94-match season.
IGA SWIATEK triumphs in R3 over Anna Kalinskaya for the 2nd major in a row
— TennisONE App (@TennisONEApp) January 24, 2026
An uneven, but decisive performance
6-1 1-6 6-1 against a big-hitter
Lost her service rhythm in set 2 and it ran away from her quick, but she bounced back emphatically with precision at start of the 3rd pic.twitter.com/goqzlYplQD
For today’s tennis picks, here’s how we’re betting on Iga Swiatek vs. Maddison Inglis today, including our Best Bet, supporting angles, and a set-score prop for bigger prices.
Best Bet: Iga Swiatek -7.5 Games (-112, FanDuel)
Book: Best price at FanDuel
Our best bet for Iga Swiatek vs. Maddison Inglis is Iga Swiatek -7.5 Games (-112, FanDuel).
Given below are the latest odds for Iga Swiatek vs. Maddison Inglis from the top sportsbooks. We are looking at the match money line, game handicap and total games, plus some set betting markets where available.
| Market | FanDuel | BetMGM |
| Moneyline | Swiatek -8000 / Inglis +2000 | Swiatek -5000 / Inglis +1400 |
| Game Handicap | Swiatek -7.5 (-112) / Inglis +7.5 (-118) | Swiatek -7.5 (-110) / Inglis +7.5 (-118) |
| Total Games | Over 16.5 (-126) / Under 16.5 (-106) | Over 16.5 (-130) / Under 16.5 (+100) |
| Set Betting | Swiatek 2-0 (-800) / Inglis 2-0 (+4500) | Swiatek 2-0 (-750) / Inglis 2-0 (+2900) |
| Total Sets | Over 2.5 (+520) / Under 2.5 (-1000) | Over 2.5 (+500) / Under 2.5 (-750) |
Our Pick: Iga Swiatek -7.5 Games (-112, FanDuel).
The moneyline is basically unusable at -8000, so you have to build your position through spreads or totals. The betting case for Swiatek winning big is that her 2025 stats point to sustained control. She won 68.8% of first-serve points, won 45.4% of return points, and converted 58% of break points over a 94-match season. That return efficiency is the key in mismatches, because it creates constant pressure even if her own serve has a few dips.
Inglis has competed well this week, but the gap in the WTA-level baseline is a real concern. Her 2025 stats came from just six WTA matches, and even though she posted 60.7% first-serve points won with 36.9% return points won, it’s hard to treat those stats as stable against top-tier opposition. She’s also already logged two three-setters in the event and will likely need to defend her serve against Swiatek.
That’s why Swiatek -7.5 games (-112) is the cleanest price point. It avoids paying an extreme tax on the straight-set price (-800) and is better than playing “Under 2.5 sets” at -1000. The latter, because the reward is little and the risk is too much.
Iga Swiatek hits a GORGEOUS forehand down the line against Anna Kalinskaya at the Australian Open.
— The Tennis Letter (@TheTennisLetter) January 24, 2026
Girl. On. Fire. 🇵🇱🔥
pic.twitter.com/h49a5jQxPO
What dreams are made of 💚💛
— TennisAustralia (@TennisAustralia) January 25, 2026
From qualifying to a maiden Grand Slam round of 16 for Maddison Inglis #AO26 pic.twitter.com/C6VhbgwMdA
Iga Swiatek has the lead 1-0 in her head-to-head over Maddison Inglis, as they last met in 2021 in Adelaide, with the Pole having a routine win.
| Year | Winner | Event | Round | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2021 | Iga Swiatek | Adelaide | Round of 16 | 6-1, 6-3 |
Projection: Iga Swiatek wins in straight sets.
Higher Variance Bet: Iga Swiatek 2-0 (-800, FanDuel). This is a high-variance play at an expensive price. It works only as a secondary add-on, not the core wager.
TV broadcasters for the 2026 Australian Open include ESPN and ESPN2 in the United States, TNT Sports in the United Kingdom, Channel 9 Network in Australia, Eurosport across Europe, beIN Sports in the Middle East and North Africa, and TSN/RDS in Canada, with streaming on 9NOW for Australian viewers.
Streaming options vary by region and often require subscriptions. Viewers can access full coverage via ESPN+ (USA, all courts/multiview), Discovery+ (UK/Europe), Stan Sport (Australia), and global platforms like Tennis TV for select ATP matches on devices worldwide.
| Match | Iga Swiatek vs. Maddison Inglis |
| Date | January 26, 2026 |
| Start Time | Not before 7:00 PM AEDT |
| Tournament | Australian Open 2026 |
| Event Type | Women’s Singles (Grand Slam) |
| Surface | Outdoor Hard Court |
| Court | Rod Laver Arena, Melbourne Park, Melbourne, Australia |
| TV Coverage | ESPN, ESPN2, Tennis Channel (US), TNT Sports (UK), Channel 9 Network (Australia), Eurosport (Europe), beIN Sports (MENA), TSN/RDS (Canada), 9NOW |
| Live Streaming | ESPN+ (US, all courts), Discovery+ (UK/Europe), Stan Sport (Australia), Tennis TV (global ATP select) |
Mandatory Image Credit: Mike Frey-Imagn Images
nfl
mma I’m an academic turned sports writer from Raipur, India, specializing in the NFL, MMA, and tennis at The Playoffs. I previously wrote for Sportskeeda and hold a B.A. and M.A. in History. My journey into sports media began far from the field, rooted in the arts and sciences. Funny enough, I didn’t grow up a sports fan; I used to see it all as just noise. But a fateful writing job introduced me to the world of sports, and what began as a gig quickly became a passion. I understood those voices aren’t noise; they’re emotions of true sports fans, and now I am one of them, writing with the same energy I once questioned.
Read moreWe use cookies for ads and to improve your experience. By continuing on the site, you agree to our Privacy Policy. Read more about it