Picks
Sportsbooks
Casino
Promos
Prediction Markets
Lottery
Guide
Tennis
Picks Sportsbooks Casino Promos Prediction Markets Lottery Guide
Gambling is prohibited for underage individuals | Commercial content | Regional restrictions may apply | T&Cs apply | Play responsibly

Revamped US Open Mixed Doubles 2025 Sparks Backlash From Doubles Specialists, Record Prize Money, and Fan Frenzy

Rudra Dubey

The US Open Mixed Doubles 2025 overhaul thrills fans but draws criticism from doubles specialists.

The US Open’s revamped mixed doubles format has sparked a heated debate across the tennis world. Condensed into two days during “Fan Week” ahead of the main draw, the event features 16 pairs competing in shortened best-of-three sets with just four games per set, no advantage after deuce, and a 10-point tiebreak replacing a full third set. 

With prize money boosted to $1 million for the winning pair, five times the 2024 payout, organizers hoped to attract top singles stars like Novak Djokovic, Iga Swiatek, Taylor Fritz, and Coco Gauff. While the spectacle has generated excitement among fans, traditional doubles specialists and former champions question the sporting integrity of the event and its impact on the value of a Grand Slam title.

US Open’s Business Strategy vs. Sporting Tradition

The United States Tennis Association (USTA) is clearly pursuing a business-driven agenda. By condensing the mixed doubles into a fan-focused “showcase” ahead of the main tournament and offering prize money that far exceeds previous years, the US Open has successfully drawn elite singles players. Bob Bryan, one of the legendary Bryan Brothers, acknowledged the appeal: “It’ll be sold out in Arthur Ashe Stadium. All the stars, the single stars, are playing it. The downside is that the doubles players won’t get a shot to play it or to defend their title … but the prize money is a big increase.”

Broadcasting partners are also a key part of the strategy. With ESPN holding exclusive US Open rights through 2037, the condensed format allows matches to be aired in primetime, maximizing exposure and advertising revenue. Eight of the 16 teams are chosen by combined rankings, while the remaining eight are wildcards, ensuring that more than half of the players are top 20 singles competitors. From a business standpoint, the USTA is creating a spectacle designed to boost viewership, sponsorships, and fan engagement.

However, this commercial approach has raised questions about the devaluation of Grand Slam doubles titles. Kristina Mladenovic, a nine-time Grand Slam champion in doubles and mixed doubles, criticized the framing of the event: “A Grand Slam is neither preparation nor fun. It’s years of sacrifice … from a sporting point of view, it’s problematic because it touches on the essence of tennis. There’s no problem putting on such an event, but above all, don’t call it a grand slam.”

Similarly, three-time US Open mixed doubles champion Jamie Murray called it “a glorified exhibition in my eyes,” highlighting the tension between fan-friendly formats and the historical prestige of a Grand Slam title.

Excitement and Backlash Among Players and Fans

The reactions have been mixed. Singles stars express enthusiasm as Djokovic said he is “excited” for what he believes will be “a very entertaining” event, while Swiatek called it “a competitive test.” Jack Draper added that the format could serve as helpful singles preparation. 

Meanwhile, doubles specialists feel marginalized. Defending champions Sara Errani and Andrea Vavassori initially described the changes as a “profound injustice,” though they were later granted a wildcard. Jan Zielinski noted that players had “no communication with players” about the new format, reflecting frustration over being excluded from traditional competitive opportunities.

The format also raises questions about skill compatibility. Elite singles players do not automatically excel in doubles, where court positioning, timing, and net play are critical. Veteran doubles experts have lamented that the new setup diminishes the chance for career-defining Grand Slam achievements in mixed doubles while rewarding already high-earning singles stars.

Fans are similarly divided. The prospect of seeing top singles players in action together is undoubtedly a draw, generating buzz during Fan Week and across social media. Yet for purists, the event’s shortened scoring system and exhibition-like qualities feel like a step away from tradition. Whether the gamble strengthens fan engagement or erodes the prestige of mixed doubles will likely shape discussions for years to come.

Mandatory Image Credit: Robert Deutsch-Imagn Images

nfl nfl
mma mma

I’m an academic turned sports writer from Raipur, India, specializing in the NFL, MMA, and tennis at The Playoffs. I previously wrote for Sportskeeda and hold a B.A. and M.A. in History. My journey into sports media began far from the field, rooted in the arts and sciences. Funny enough, I didn’t grow up a sports fan; I used to see it all as just noise. But a fateful writing job introduced me to the world of sports, and what began as a gig quickly became a passion. I understood those voices aren’t noise; they’re emotions of true sports fans, and now I am one of them, writing with the same energy I once questioned.

Read more