Italy has a long and complicated relationship with gambling. From the state lottery to football pools, wagering has been part of the country’s social fabric for generations. What’s changed – sharply, over the last several years – is the medium through which Italians consume sport, and by extension, how and when they decide to place a bet.
The rise of streaming platforms has quietly restructured the sports- watching experience. Services like DAZN, Sky Go, and Amazon Prime Video have replaced the living room television set for millions of younger viewers. And as the screen moved from the wall to the smartphone, so did the betting impulse. Real- time odds, push notifications, in- play markets – all of it sits just a swipe away from whatever match someone is watching on their phone at 9 p.m. on a Tuesday.
This article examines the relationship between streaming consumption and betting behavior in Italy, drawing on available data, regulatory developments, and behavioral patterns that researchers and industry observers have started to document more systematically in recent years.
Italy ranks among Europe’s more active streaming markets. By 2024, DAZN alone had reported over three million paying subscribers in the country – largely on the back of exclusive Serie A broadcasting rights it secured from 2021 onward. Sky Italia continues to hold significant market share for live sport, and Mediaset’s Infinity platform has carved out its own audience. Together, these services have fundamentally altered when, where, and how Italians watch football.
The shift to mobile viewing is particularly relevant here. According to data from the Italian Communications Authority (AGCOM), mobile broadband traffic in Italy grew by roughly 23% year- on- year between 2021 and 2023, with video streaming accounting for the largest single share of that traffic. This isn’t just a generational story – it’s a behavioral one. Watching a match on your phone, alone or with earphones in, is a genuinely different psychological experience than watching it in a pub or around a shared family screen.
That environment, it turns out, is one where betting impulses are considerably easier to act on.
The relationship between live sports viewing and betting isn’t new – bookmakers have built their business around it for decades. What streaming has done is compress the time between impulse and action to almost nothing.
When a viewer watches a Serie A match on traditional broadcast television, placing a bet requires a deliberate sequence of steps: picking up a different device, unlocking it, opening an app, logging in, navigating to the right market. That friction creates pause. It gives the impulse time to fade. Streaming, particularly on mobile, removes most of that friction. The betting app is already on the phone. The match is already on the phone. They are two taps apart.
Betting sites in Italy are well aware of this dynamic and have built their product design around it. Major ADM- licensed operators offer dedicated apps calibrated specifically for in- play betting: markets update in real time, odds shift visibly during key moments, and interfaces are designed to work during the natural lulls of a live broadcast – halftime, stoppage time, the thirty seconds after a goal goes in. The product is built for the exact environment that streaming has created.
ADM’s annual report for 2023 noted that online channels accounted for approximately 72% of total legal gambling turnover in Italy – a figure that had risen from around 55% just five years prior. The direction of travel is clear.
The table below draws on publicly available data from ADM annual reports and independent market research to illustrate how key indicators have shifted as Italy’s streaming market has grown:
| Year | Online Betting Share (% of total) | Mobile Share (% of online) | DAZN Active Subs – Italy (est.) | In- Play Share (% of sports bets) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2019 | 55% | 48% | ~1.2M | 41% |
| 2020 | 60% | 54% | ~1.8M | 47% |
| 2021 | 65% | 61% | ~2.5M | 53% |
| 2022 | 69% | 67% | ~3.0M | 59% |
| 2023 | 72% | 71% | ~3.2M | 64% |
Sources: ADM Annual Reports; AGCOM; operator estimates. Figures are approximate and reflect available public data.
The correlation here is not direct proof of causation – COVID- 19 lockdowns, rising smartphone penetration, and expanding broadband access all contributed independently. But the trend lines run in the same direction, and the timing aligns closely with both the expansion of streaming services and the growing sophistication of mobile betting products in Italy.
There is a specific behavioral mechanism worth understanding here. When people watch sport in shared social environments – a stadium, a bar, even a living room with family – the presence of others and basic physical constraints provide some natural regulation of impulsive decisions. The mobile streaming environment offers none of those external checks.
Research in behavioral economics has long shown that ease of access is one of the strongest predictors of impulsive gambling behavior. This is not a moral observation about willpower; it’s about how environments shape choices at a very practical level. A viewer watching a match on DAZN on their phone, with a betting app already installed and a saved payment method, is in a setting that both sides of the transaction have optimized for conversion.
Live streaming introduces another element: what behavioral researchers call “temporal proximity” – the feeling of being inside the moment, that this specific second is uniquely significant. In- play betting markets are built precisely around this sensation. “Will the next goal come before the 70th minute?” is a question that would feel meaningless anywhere else, but during a live stream it feels immediate, answerable, and urgent. That manufactured urgency is the commercial engine underneath the product.
Streaming platforms and betting operators share a core design philosophy built around retention: keeping users engaged, coming back, and transacting. They approach this goal from different angles, but the effect is often complementary.
Within the betting segment, one mechanism commonly used to bring new users onto a platform is no deposit bonuses – offers that allow first- time registrants to place bets or explore casino products without making an initial financial commitment. In Italy, these have drawn specific regulatory attention because they reduce the psychological barrier to a first bet, particularly for users who might not otherwise have considered themselves bettors. ADM has implemented rules around how such promotional offers can be advertised, but enforcement in the digital environment – especially on platforms operating from outside Italian jurisdiction – remains an ongoing challenge for regulators.
Beyond welcome promotions, retention features like personalized notifications, odds alerts tied to ongoing matches, and in- app streaming integrations have blurred the line between watching and wagering in ways that weren’t technically possible even five years ago.

Italy’s framework for online gambling is among the more structured in Europe, and understanding it provides important context for this discussion. The ADM issues licenses to operators, enforces compliance, and maintains a whitelist of approved platforms. Unlicensed gambling activity is illegal, and Italian internet service providers are required to block access to non- whitelisted gambling sites.
The landmark regulatory moment was the “Dignity Decree” of 2018, which introduced a broad ban on gambling advertising across television, radio, print, online, and outdoor channels. The intention was to reduce normalisation of gambling, particularly among younger audiences. The effect has been significant, though not without complications – operators have sought alternative channels, and the line between information and advertising in digital spaces is contested.
AGCOM has also become more active in scrutinizing the intersection of digital platforms and gambling content. Recommendations issued in 2023 called for greater transparency requirements on streaming services that carry betting- adjacent material, with particular attention to content that reaches under- 18 audiences.
A dimension that sits somewhat apart from sports streaming, but is directly relevant to the broader picture, is the role of gaming and entertainment streamers who incorporate gambling content into their broadcasts. In Italy, as across Europe, a small number of high- profile streamers built significant audiences partly around live casino content – presenting gambling as entertainment rather than financial activity.
Italy’s 2018 advertising restrictions technically extend to influencer activity that promotes gambling services, but enforcement has been inconsistent, and creators operating through platforms hosted outside Italy have proven difficult to hold accountable through domestic mechanisms. This gap has prompted Italian regulators to advocate for broader cross- border enforcement frameworks through EU channels – a conversation that is ongoing but has produced limited binding outcomes so far.
The structural integration of streaming and betting in Italy is not early- stage – it is already built. Licensed operators have mobile- first products optimized for the streaming viewer. Streaming services command growing rights to live sport. Italian users have demonstrated consistent preferences for in- play and mobile channels. Each year’s data adds to the same picture.
What remains genuinely open is how regulators and platform providers will respond as the overlap deepens. Streaming companies hold unusual leverage in this dynamic: they control the environment in which millions of Italians watch sport, and their product decisions – notification design, second- screen features, advertising placement – carry direct behavioral implications that current regulatory frameworks were not specifically built to address.
For Italy, where problem gambling rates have historically been among the higher in the EU, this is not an abstract policy question. The ADM’s framework is sophisticated by European standards, but it was designed for a world in which the television and the betting shop were separate things. That separation, for a large and growing portion of the Italian audience, no longer exists.
Yes. Online betting is fully legal in Italy when conducted through operators holding a valid ADM licence. The regulator maintains a whitelist of approved platforms; using unlicensed sites is a criminal offence under Italian law, and access to such sites is actively blocked by domestic ISPs.
The Dignity Decree of 2018 introduced a broad prohibition on gambling advertising across virtually all channels, including television, radio, print, online, and outdoor formats. Limited exemptions exist, but the general framework is among the most restrictive in the EU.
In- play (or live) betting allows users to wager on events that are already underway – for instance, which team will score next, or whether a player will receive a card in the next ten minutes. Its growth correlates directly with mobile viewing: when match and betting app share the same device, the switch between them takes seconds rather than minutes.
Streaming platforms are not currently regulated as gambling entities under Italian law. However, AGCOM has issued guidance recommending greater transparency on platforms that carry betting- related content, particularly where younger demographics are involved. The regulatory perimeter is still being defined.
ADM- licensed operators are required to offer deposit limits, session time reminders, reality checks, and self- exclusion options. Italy also operates a national self- exclusion register (AAMS). Advocacy groups have argued, however, that the growth of in- play and mobile betting has outpaced the implementation of these tools in practical terms.